Advertise Here
Advertise Here
Advertise Here
Advertise Here
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 12347 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 84

Thread: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

  1. #11
    VIP Member galiano's Avatar
    Join Date
    17-06-2008
    Posts
    797
    Uploads
    8
    Likes
    1

    Re: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

    I installed 7477. Works well for 40 minutes, but then crashed!

  2. Advertise Here
  3. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    04-08-2010
    Posts
    36
    Uploads
    0
    Likes
    0

    Re: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

    i have the same problem using newer builds , peers on 7190 have a bug in camd , loads of camd fixes since 7190 .

    i use

    block_same_ip = 0
    block_same_name = 0

    in newer builds too .

    i give each cache ex 3 user a different group .

    cache ex 3 works fine on newer builds for me . i only got mem fill from people who put all readers and users in same group .

  4. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    27-10-2011
    Posts
    18
    Uploads
    1
    Likes
    0

    Re: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

    for an hour an half everyhting seems fine, memory is about the same as it was when i restarted with 7477 cpu is at 2% at the most
    bandwidth seems ok.

    only issue atm is the camd35 reader, hmmm

  5. #14
    Super Moderator turbopower's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-07-2011
    Location
    Somewhere between the Streams
    Posts
    4,016
    Uploads
    129
    Likes
    303

    Re: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

    For me work fine for now and hits are more. I don`t send cache on 2 camd35 peers but i think this is misconfiguration from his side. I use settings from 1 post.

  6. #15
    VIP Member CapNCooK's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-03-2012
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    325
    Uploads
    4
    Likes
    4

    Re: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

    To clear some smoke out of the air...


    Quote Originally Posted by mikie8 View Post
    i use

    block_same_ip = 0
    block_same_name = 0
    These settings have only effect on normal sharing. Cache-ex is not influenced by this.

    --

    Quote Originally Posted by mikie8 View Post
    i give each cache ex 3 user a different group
    Cache-EX is never sent back to the peer it came from, however the group is applied.

    I verified this by putting log command in d512:
    (you need to have reader and user named with the username in the label)

    tail --follow=name /var/log/oscam/oscam.log | grep <username> | grep <SID (just pick one)>

    This way, your log shows the incoming ("got") cache from a peer for a specific SID.
    If this ECM was pushed back to the same user, another logline would show ("pushed to <user>") but it doesn't.

    I have all peers (about 60) in group 1...

    --

    Quote Originally Posted by mikie8 View Post
    i only got mem fill from people who put all readers and users in same group

    Please be very precise in stating that. What version did you test with high mem filled ? How high is this mem ?
    This could be a reason to re-start debugging...


    Quote Originally Posted by galiano
    I installed 7477. Works well for 40 minutes, but then crashed!

    Hmm.. as long as peers are using versions between 7191 <> 7174, there is a risk that you receive corrupt cache.
    Just a few days ago, a complete disastarous build was released, causing cache to flood.. (high bandwidth).
    If you still exchanging with a peer on that build, your oscam wil defenitly crash..

    This needs some time..

    Thx!


  7. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    29-07-2012
    Posts
    32
    Uploads
    0
    Likes
    0

    Re: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

    CapNCook is the new build working good for you?

  8. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    04-08-2010
    Posts
    36
    Uploads
    0
    Likes
    0

    Re: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

    oscam is a work in progress , in some versions the module you want works great , in others it dont . i prefer to have manual settings as relying on oscam to be totally perfect is a gamble .

    different groups allows me to share the cache i want with who i want .

    the biggest problem i have is getting my camd peers to agree to move over to cccam .

    i only compile the modules i use , im hoping to compile without camd soon .

  9. #18
    VIP Member CapNCooK's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-03-2012
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    325
    Uploads
    4
    Likes
    4

    Re: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

    Quote Originally Posted by CyberCrime View Post
    CapNCook is the new build working good for you?
    Yes Cyber, just doing it perfectly:

    Start: 20.09.12 - 17:12:53 | UpTime: 06:20:16 | Process ID: 24234

    Mem: 2.2
    CPU avg 30%

    Doesn't it work for you ?

  10. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    29-07-2012
    Posts
    32
    Uploads
    0
    Likes
    0

    Re: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

    not tried yet mate but i will do in a bit, i did run 7461 for over 36hrs and that worked great for me.
    it just didnt like the older versions so reinstalled 6923 again. my cpu load was only about 4% with 7461. strange how it worked for some and not for others.
    i was never a fan of 7190 worked great for about 20hrs on my system and then it would stop sending to some lines, not all but some. with 6923 i was running that version for over 2 weeks without rebooting. but my local cards didn't like it lol

  11. #20
    VIP Member CapNCooK's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-03-2012
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    325
    Uploads
    4
    Likes
    4

    Re: CACHE-EX TRYFIX build >= 7474

    Quote Originally Posted by CyberCrime View Post
    not tried yet mate but i will do in a bit, i did run 7461 for over 36hrs and that worked great for me.
    it just didnt like the older versions so reinstalled 6923 again. my cpu load was only about 4% with 7461. strange how it worked for some and not for others.
    i was never a fan of 7190 worked great for about 20hrs on my system and then it would stop sending to some lines, not all but some. with 6923 i was running that version for over 2 weeks without rebooting. but my local cards didn't like it lol
    OK. Well 7190 is past now.. Really good result with > 7474, and a lot of cache-ex bugs have been removed..
    Still some people report camd35 disconnects.. this needs to be investigated.

    I personally dont have this, having a few camd35 peers connected at the user side.

    Curious about the results of you all!

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 12347 ... LastLast
Advertise Here

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20-11-2023, 17:03:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •