best cach config require

[CapNCooK]

Update again.. another bug is just resolved regarding CE stats.

Check daily for updates on CE here: http://www.streamboard.tv/oscam/timeline

[gimic]

He should think you are using cache.. and therefore a CW could be late(r).
Not really a problem if the CW is "on-time" for the given CAID ?

Yes, but wouldn't the oscam on the other side rate him as slow peer and preferring an other faster peer next time he wants a cw for that channel?

[acac1979]

Yes, but wouldn't the oscam on the other side rate him as slow peer and preferring an other faster peer next time he wants a cw for that channel?

Hi gimic,

I understand your point of view, but dont forget with cacheex working well the requests that you made to your servers will decrease significantly. For many oscam users this could be a very important fact.

Best regards

[m404]

I think the idea of cacheex is, to be an aid to local card and not the main way of watching TV!

mh, not sure whether to agree or disagree, as you kinda contradict yourself.

the thing is : IF (!) cache is available on your server for watching TV with cache being "the main way", then yes, it SHOULD be the main way.

requesting an ECM reply from a physical card when there is a cached reply available is a complete waste of the whole concept.

[galiano]

"IF" is very important part of your post! If all users want main way of watching TV, to be via cache, which will generate it?

[CapNCooK]

Dynwait should solve that problem.. No cache == No (- or less) wait..

[m404]

"IF" is very important part of your post! If all users want main way of watching TV, to be via cache, which will generate it?

what the _user_ wants, is of no relevance? :P
it's the owner of the card, that makes the choice and sets up his system accordingly ... IF cache is available (for whatever reason, including the fact that someone else already triggered the ecm reply on his very own card) then cache is taken, if no cache is available then the card is asked ...

I think you're talking about people that have only cache, and no locals ... but that's the same discussion as back in the days people with only nlines and no locals ... leechers will always be "a problem"

[alba100]

I use OSCAM 1.20-unstable_svn build r9117 on a Ubuntu 10.04 32 Bit with Reshare Nline for SKY UK 0963

I use CACHE MODE 1 and connect 19 servers together

My issue is freezing and glitching

where is my mistake? and what is best suggestion for my situation?

There is some of my settings:
########################
Oscam.Conf
########################
[global]
disablelog = 1
logfile = /tmp/oscam2.log
usrfileflag = 1
clienttimeout = 11000
fallbacktimeout = 2600
clientmaxidle = 200
bindwait = 40
nice = -2
maxlogsize = 8096
waitforcards = 0
waitforcards_extra_delay = 300
preferlocalcards = 1
readerrestartseconds = 3600
dropdups = 1
block_same_ip = 0
block_same_name = 0
cwlogdir = /var/log/oscam/CW.log
emmlogdir = /var/log/oscam/EMM.log
lb_mode = 1
lb_save = 300
lb_nbest_readers = 2
lb_stat_cleanup = 100
suppresscmd08 = 1

[cache]
delay = 1
max_time = 14
wait_time = 275
csp_allow_request = 0
cwcycle_check_enable = 1
cwcycle_check_caid = 0963
cwcycle_maxlist = 4000

[cccam]
port = 24000
nodeid = 8A8CA066107A14DA
version = 2.3.0
reshare = 0
ignorereshare = 1
stealth = 1
keepconnected = 0

################################
Cache setting on Oscam.server
################################

[reader]
label = cache-1
protocol = cccam
device = xxxxx
user = cache-1
password = cache-1
inactivitytimeout = 30
cacheex = 1
group = 1
dropbadcws = 1
cccversion = 2.3.0
ccckeepalive = 1
cccreshare = 3

################################
Cache setting on Oscam.user
################################

[account]
user = cache-1
pwd = cache-1
group = 1
cacheex = 1
cccreshare = 1