Suggestion for OSCAM forum section re-organisation

[Sat-TV]

From what I know you can only exchange in protocol like cccam, gbox, etc.. but OSCam is not a protocol.

[turbopower]

See some of threads in cccam exchange forum. Our members want no oscam to be messed in c lines exchange.

not mosc not csp not oscam

[CapNCooK]

See some of threads in cccam exchange forum. Our members want no oscam to be messed in c lines exchange.

I know that. But i believe that the main reason why CC-Cam users are scared to connect with Oscam peers, is because of the possibility that Oscam can abuse shares by adjusting a few parameters, so re-shares can be ignored and altered and so forth.

They think: if i only interconnect with CC-Cam 2.30 peers (because CC-Cam 2.0.xx has a re-share ignore feature too) they will be safe from abusing.

--

For this reason, Oscam is hated and banned on several cardsharing forums on the net..., something i strongly disagree with, because experienced Oscam users will be suspect of abusing only by running Oscam in stead of the "Trusted" CC-Cam platform.

Any abuse of re-shares can be checked easily by ECM count, and Oscam is already, and will be even more mature and flexible than CC-Cam ever was.

And even so.. if you would split forums..
When you put CC-Cam stealth to ON in Oscam, and advertise as CC-Cam server in the dedicated CC-Cam forum, no-one will be able to determine that you actually using Oscam.

[turbopower]

Our forums are created to complete main wishes on most on our members. I see in my logs that oscam generate illegal login into cccam. I think the listed camd are not fully compliant to exchange each other.

Spliting is not big deal for me but firstly we need to think is this will not cause decreasing the exchange in our cccam section.

[CapNCooK]

Our forum are created to complete main wishes on most from our members. I see in my logs that oscam generate illegal login into cccam. I think listed camd are not fully compliant to exchange each other.

It is true that camd has some bugs, on both ends (Oscam and CC-cam).
Works fine with cache, but haven't got very stable experiences with normal sharing either.

Why don't use a more mature protocol to connect to CC-Cam, like newcamd or CC-Cam itself ?
I have my locals connected this way, never had any issues.

--

And don't understand me the wrong way :)
If there is a real need by users on this board demanding a dedicated CC-Cam section, it must be created...
Personally, and that's just one vouch against, I don't see any benefit, because you can't check/control the advertised CC-Cam servers to be genuine CC-Cam.
It will be subject to abuse, and hidden Oscam servers will be advertised to share with the ones that demand "pure" CC-Cam, just to get the card they want.

[turbopower]

I suggest to make poll in cccam exchange section for about 2 weeks let`s our members decide about this. In my side i don`t have problems for connection between oscam and cccam i use camd35 and newcamd for this. Because cccam can`t read my locals i send it to my cccam, both are on same pc.

[Sat-TV]

I suggest to make poll in cccam exchange section for about 2 weeks let`s our members decide about this. In my side i don`t have problems for connection between oscam and cccam i use camd35 and newcamd for this. Because cccam can`t read my locals i send it to my cccam, both are on same pc.

I fully agree with this idea, what the members want they will get

Best Regards,
Sat-TV

[turbopower]

Ok, I will take care about this and will collect and publish the results here.

Regards

[Luffy Media]

Nice Bro :p

[TV_LICENCE]

so far
9 voted yes
4 voted against
probably 3 0r 4 votes out of 13 are the staff members
THAT IS A LOT OF ACTIVITY )))))))))))))